I actually think the analysis works better not having anybody with a huge number of wins in the sample. I think the most of any individual person in the YAVP forum is about 10 wins, which is less than 5% of the total dataset. Having one or two people with 50 wins would need a much larger dataset to compensate for the preferences of those one or two players. Having one person who has 40 wins that are all human thieves would probably need thousands of total entries to eliminate the bias they're introducing. Large number of people contributing small amount of data > Small number of people contributing large amount of data.
I agree that the server results would be better, but in the twenty or so minutes that it took me to do this, I doubt I could come up with a way to get this information off the server in a trivial way. Honestly, if there was any real interest in this in a comprehensive way, it would probably be better to bribe sorear or jaakos to just have the server automatically log this information somewhere on its own.
Incidentally, I'm surprised hurthlings aren't played more as well. I'd say they're probably in my top 3 choices for races. Certainly above gnomes or dwarves. Then again, I like orcs and trolls and dislike all types of elves, so I'm a bit atypical.
Hoping to win with every class, doomed. Archer, Barbarian, Bard, Beastfighter, Druid, Elementalist, Farmer, Fighter, Monk, and ULE Priest down.