Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 29

Thread: ADOM Wiki

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    4

    Default ADOM Wiki

    We all know Andy Williams' http://www.andywlms.com/adom/ for the Adom guidebook, but I think the ADOM community would benefit greatly from an ADOM wiki similar to what Nethack has at http://nethack.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page. It's an incredibly valuable resource, and a wiki is essentially ideal for Roguelikes. There exists at least one already at http://adom.wikidot.com/, but its very under developed right now. I think a community effort to port the guidebook to this wiki, or a new one at wikia would help everyone.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    4

    Default Gen ADOM?

    Also, should this maybe be in the General ADOM section instead?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    721

    Default Wiki?

    RogueBasin ?? Hmm, not a good idea.

    Whatever we do, it definitely has to be downloadable.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    176

    Default

    I'm just thinking... Adom has that wonderful and download able Guide, we should wait for jade and then writte a guide for it.. or even a modding guide..
    I never won a Adom game...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    4

    Default

    I think that it is a good idea when JADE comes.. ADOM it self is not changing anymore so a the guidebook itself is kindda sufficient.. But when JADE is release.. I bet there is a lot of information that needs to be documented that can benefit from community participation..

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Germany, Witten
    Posts
    994

    Default ADOM Wiki

    Quote Originally Posted by seepage87 View Post
    We all know Andy Williams' http://www.andywlms.com/adom/ for the Adom guidebook, but I think the ADOM community would benefit greatly from an ADOM wiki similar to what Nethack has at http://nethack.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page. It's an incredibly valuable resource, and a wiki is essentially ideal for Roguelikes. There exists at least one already at http://adom.wikidot.com/, but its very under developed right now. I think a community effort to port the guidebook to this wiki, or a new one at wikia would help everyone.
    The ADOM & JADE Wiki is the next (and final) improvement on my list of major things to be done for the website... but this will a month or two... for now I'm happy and busy playing with the blog and the forums and the next step should happen once more JADE code is finished
    Thomas Biskup
    ADOM & Ultimate ADOM Maintainer
    https://www.adom.de - https://www.ultimate-adom.com

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    225

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by adom-admin View Post
    The ADOM & JADE Wiki is the next (and final) improvement on my list of major things to be done for the website... but this will a month or two...

    That should be enough time for me to finish SivWiki
    Ancient Domains of Insanity
    Insane Dungeon of the Rogues
    Twitch

    If you happen to know of a location to a missing chapter of ADOI, please contact me. <3

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,077

    Default

    I've seen that we can already reach the wiki... if we can guess its address

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    5,014

    Default

    Can we get Andy Williams' permission to port the current Guidebook to the wiki? And will there be any policing to stop code-dived information being put in? I agree a wiki would be nice, especially since certain sections of the current Guidebook are out of date or could do with expansion. I worry about some very wrong information getting in though - how do the Nethack guys take care of this?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,077

    Default

    I agree that we should port Guidebook to Wiki (of course after asking Andy for permission).

    I think NetHack does not have this problem (wrong information) since it is open source. I suppose we could have a rule that whenever you enter information, you add "[unconfirmed]", unless it has been already confirmed in a discussion somewhere (then you should add a link to this discussion). You can also confirm someone else's information and remove [unconfirmed]. Some people would check the Recent Changes and verify that these rules are applied.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •