Added. Send me your real name to creator(at)ancientdomainsofmystery.com.

Furthermore I think that

* When somebody misses, it should be a simple "x misses y". Much shorter and faster to read than "x strikes at y with a <weapon> but misses!". Or replace the verb "strikes at" with "misses" and omit the "...but misses!"; this preserves the info about the attacking weapon.
* When there is a critical hit, the "critically hitting" feels clumsy and redundant when there is "moderately wounding/ killing x" right after it. "with full force", "in a vital spot" (ADOM equivalents IIRC) would sound better and less gameruley.
* Natural attacks should also get their own verbs: "The rat bites you..." "The orc punches..."
* Maybe even remove the "lightly/moderately/etc wounding you" when it is the player who is being attacked. Player wound status is redundant when you can see it easily in the status bar.

Actually, I'd prefer if Thomas keeps the in-line wound status, for people who don't always check the sidebar (like blind players with screen readers). Just my two cents though.

More thoughts:

* The natural attack of immaterial monsters like ghosts and shadows should be "touch", punching would feel out-of-character. "The shadow touches you. You feel weak!"
* Have the death reason in highscore list depend on attack type. Blunt weapon: "Had his face smashed by an orc". Piercing weapon: "Was impaled by a goblin scavenger". Slashing weapon: "Had his body slit open by a kobold". Biting: "Was eaten alive by a rat". Touching: "Was poked to death by a ghost".

Bump... most of my ideas didn't get implemented. I'd really like to see "critically hitting x" changed to "with full force" and simplification of "...but misses" messages. (Should I make a separate RFE?)

Actually most of the suggestions came after I closed the ticket :-) Please open a new ticket as some of the ideas are really good :-) !