Originally Posted by
JellySlayer
I was thinking mostly of the latter type of case. While there are people who argue that you can't be truly free without essentially godlike (or at least dictatorial) powers, I don't find this reasoning terribly compelling. I suppose if the degree of freedom you have is a continuum, a being with those abilities would certainly be more free than we are.
I will stick to the example of being forced with a gun, then.
My feeling is that such a situation does not conflict with the concept of free will at all. You are not truly forced; it is just that certain choices will very clearly lead to very bad outcomes. Very few people prefer to die if there is an alternative at all. But you do have a choice. Some people may choose to die if the alternative is to do something terrible. Or choose to attack the person with the gun, even if this means a very high risk of being killed. Heck, some people volunteer to blow themselves up.
It's just the extreme end. Every choice has more preferred and less preferred options*. If someone "forces" you to do something, it just means he tries to make one option as unattractive as possible. But in the end it still depends 100% on the internal evaluation of the person how he responds.
*unless you're indifferent of course, but usually this is not the case
Last edited by grobblewobble; 08-28-2013 at 11:15 PM.
You steal a scroll labelled HITME. The orc hits you.